« belief | Main | at heart my underwear says, 'bye, nuala' »
June 06, 2003
miss liberty @ the weddings
as most of you know i am going to two weddings this summer. my ex-boyfriend's and my cousin's. this is a cause for concern because they are two weeks apart and both in the northwest. the main thing i have to worry about is the clothing options. i love clothes.
both of these weddings are during the day and both are outside-ish. i saw this article today from msn.com and learned that bare shoulders is a no no. HA. what about bare asses people? don't think i won't do it. well, ok true i wouldn't do that. but these shoulders of mine are going to be bare as a baby's bottom. (yes i will be wrapping huggies around them for the day. crap those are white! i can't wear white!) and men (ahem jason and jacob ahem) are supposed to wear seer-sucker suits. a great name for a suit. almost as good as six hour sex on the see-saw at the sea-shore. i told that wrong. i should have written it down like kati vol did. =P
anyway as my blue hair with stars stuck in and red and white dress was booed by the masses, i'm not sure what to do next. maybe it's time to buy that pvc dress i've been eyeing. maybe erica and i should make our own costumes--dresses, i mean. dianna, what are YOU going to wear?
will my tried and true method of wearing lingerie to all major functions serve in this situation? i don't see why not.
Posted by michele at June 6, 2003 03:47 PM
Comments
the bare shoulders are only recommended if the wedding is in a “religious place.” I think you’re in the clear. And I too vote against the Miss Liberty themed outfit.
Posted by: marina at June 6, 2003 09:29 PM
Posted by: michele at June 6, 2003 10:37 PM
Posted by: michele at June 6, 2003 10:37 PM
Wear what ever you want, John told me to wear a rubber band, a pop bottle cap, and some pasties too his wedding, and I’m the best man? Go figure.
Unfortionally he changed his mind before I completed gather all the items. Me Sad now.
Posted by: James at June 6, 2003 11:11 PM
Posted by: kati at June 7, 2003 07:52 AM
i love john.
i have these things called nipple huggers…you could wear them. they are freaky. and don’t work very well. stupid cheap sex toys.
Posted by: michele at June 7, 2003 07:57 AM
i want this one:
http://store.yahoo.com/akaara/hw-cg002-dn.html
or this one:
http://store.yahoo.com/akaara/leg-v5529.html
Posted by: michele at June 7, 2003 07:59 AM
Posted by: marina at June 7, 2003 09:41 AM
Sweetie, it wouldn’t be a function if you didn’t wear lingerie! I vote something pink and lacy. Weddings exist, after all, to help single people meet other single people—the bride and groom are beside the point. Be sexy!
Posted by: jenny at June 7, 2003 11:28 AM
yes, i am with you in the sexy sexy dresses. well, i won’t be with you IN your dress. i’ll be in my own dress. i promise. =P
Posted by: erica at June 7, 2003 11:54 AM
you know, i just looked through my closet and discovered that my entire wardrobe contains only one nice and relatively formal dress. it’s bright crimson, and when i tried it on this morning jacob took one look and ran off to take a cold shower.
maybe i should bring it along with me so that anyone who objects to my shoulders (which will most assuredly be bare) will have something to remind them i could have done worse.
Posted by: dianna at June 7, 2003 03:47 PM
marina- i like how you pick the one which is two hundred dollars more than the other one.
jenny- thank you for the lingerie constancy.
erica- hop right in, shortcakes.
dianna- reaLLY? awesome! any dress that makes jacob take a cold shower is a-ok in my books. well a-ok as long as YOU are wearing it and not someone else.
Posted by: michele at June 8, 2003 01:58 AM
well, he also commented that you would probably love to have it (it’s a kimono dress made in japan in 1940something), but i’m afraid i can’t allow that. there would be too many cold showers all around.
cold showers aside, what i’ll probably do is find some nice (i.e. just slightly bootylicious) slacks and some kind of sleeveless sweatery top or something. in fact, i used to own precisely the outfit i’m thinking of and then i outgrew the pants and gave away the top. blast. maybe i should just join the sexy dresses contingent… this had better be a damn big dress to fit all three of us.
Posted by: dianna at June 8, 2003 04:07 PM
our dress will be like a clown car. we can just keep piling out of it.
kimono dress!? dude. can i see it?
Posted by: michele at June 8, 2003 04:55 PM
Posted by: dianna at June 9, 2003 11:25 AM
out of virtue of being tallest and youngest i suppose we could let you drive. (how are those virtues?)
Posted by: michele at June 9, 2003 11:48 AM
I like the second dress best too. But $200 is too much. But then again what else are you going to spend your money on. See Gene! This is where it goes.
Hee hee. I live vicariously through you. Buy it and send me pictures.
Posted by: nuala at June 10, 2003 01:14 PM
Posted by: michele at June 10, 2003 01:28 PM
i want that dress too. make it a size 9 if you get it… i’m sure if that’s not the right size you can find someone who’ll be delighted to take it off your hands. there’s probably someone posting comments on your page right now who’d want it, in fact!
Posted by: dianna at June 11, 2003 10:22 AM
hmm i just realized that the second one which you are all professing to like more is actually the cheaper one. it’s me who likes the more expensive one most.
but i will get neither of them! i will content myself with a spiky bra!
Posted by: michele at June 11, 2003 10:31 AM
well, actually i was talking about either one. but i think i do like the first one better, because i don’t know about those butt-tucks on the second one.
Posted by: dianna at June 12, 2003 11:23 AM
i think you can undo the butt tucks… i kind of liked them though. for when you don’t want your clothes dragging in the dirt. for all those times you’re in the dirt.
Posted by: michele at June 12, 2003 12:05 PM