Categotry Archives: Movie Reviews

for a coen brother film this movie was a let-down. george clooney plays the same character he always plays. only in this one instead of being obsessive about his hair as he was in o brother he was constantly messing with his teeth. kim told me that they were trying to copy some old-style movies and yeah, ok they sort of were, but (and this is the crucial but) they kind of updated too much and as an homage it wasn’t all that compelling.

this movie was ok, but no gem.

in case anyone was considering whether or not to see this movie and remained undecided, let me clear up your dilemna. get your ass in gear and go see it. holy fuck it is amazing. the cinematography, the fight scenes, the acting, the variety of film styles used, the music, oh man. it is unbelievable. it is so good. i can’t even talk about it. all i can do is recommend the seeing of it and the railing over the fact that volume 2 doesn’t come out till february.

things which were amazing:

the animation sequence (particularly “whimper”)

the fight between the bride and the yakuza (the blood! the switch to b/w!)

lucy liu

uma thurman

the beginning

the cliffhangy end

the editing

the obvious planning and forethought which went into each section/chapter

jack black rocks. ok, this movie is beyond childish but it’s really quite good. i mean, sure jack black’s character ‘dewey finn’ is a bit of an ass, but the kids are so fucking adorable. and the whole concept is so great. plus it’s rocking.

story: jb gets kicked out of his band and has no money while his roommate, a substitute teacher, is demanding the rent. he takes a call for said roomie and pretends to be him to get a subbing job at a prestigious private school. there he finds out the kids are all classically trained on various instruments and he sets up the classroom to teach them about rock n roll. in order to get back at his bandmates who kicked him out he enters himself and the kids in the “battle of the bands” contest. blah blah blobbity blah

so many moments in this movie are just pure funny. i was giggling pretty much the whole time. admittedly, not many people that i know would appreciate this movie, but it is basically appealing to all ages and keeps jack black within circumscribed limits so that it can remain good wholesome fun.

the best part about this movie is definitely the kids. they are amazing. and soooo funny. there’s one, who jack black calls ‘fancy pants’, who is the token gay kid. he is fucking sweet. he gets to be the band’s ‘stylist’, although no one agrees with his flashy glitter rock style. he also calls jack black ‘tacky’, which was a wonderful moment for all concerned. then there’s the lead guitarist who is incredibly talented and also very silly when learning how to properly make facial expressions while strumming. summer, the band’s manager, is this anal retentive little girl who is completely bossy but still adorable and has the brilliant idea which gets them into the ‘battle of the bands’ (they all pretend to be terminally ill). freddy, the drummer, even lies down on the ground because that is how dedicated he is to faking illness, and boy howdy is he ever serious about being punk. the singers have lovely voices, the groupies tart themselves up nicely and take ‘adoring the band’ very seriously.

with so many people in the movie and all the kids being together with jack black in almost every scene, it was hard for things to be distinguished. but the director gives you time to take in everything that is going on in the foreground, background, left, right. which is good. since it gives one time to fully appreciate what everyone is doing while taking it all in as a whole. there’s usually little absurd things going on in pockets which are great fun to catch.

joan cusack as the principal is an inspired choice. jack black is greatly asinine. and the kids steal the show. plus their song is catchy.

i love sneaking into movies. so free! and exhilarating.

i expected this movie to be better after the praise my brother heaped on it. but it was kind of a let down.

once upon a time in mexico is a sequel to desperado, which itself followed el mariachi (which had different actors). i wish i could give a plot synopsis of ouatim, but sadly there was none. if anything the story was, “mexico is not as weak as you think. fuck off and let us handle our own problems.” seriously. this movie had, as far as i could tell, almost NOTHING to do with the previous one.

they followed some of the same conventions in pacing and story telling. ie at the beginning someone walks into a bar and hears a story about the legend myth man of EL mariachi. but then this one just went all to pieces with too many plot elements to follow, too much double crossing, and too much ‘revenge’. and whose fault can all these problems be laid at the feet of? johnny depp. his character was trying to mastermind this whole coup to stop a coup to have his own coup, that everything became mushy like pea soup. and similarly opaque.

on the other hand, johnny depp was brilliant as ever. and even said, “savvy” which he says all the time in pirates of the carribean. ahhhh the man really only plays one role. and he does it so well.

antonio banderas just goes around shooting things and being all noble. people who died in desperado are alive and well. a new bad guy has popped up and has a past with selma hayek’s character. completely out of the blue. she herself is hardly in this movie. it was all kind of flighty.

plus enrique iglesias is in this movie. he’s a son of mexico you know.

some good lines by depp. “are you a mexiCAN or a mexiCAN’T?” that’s really more racist than good. “fuck you.” “fuck off.” i like it when he swears. the whole movie he just speaks in english to all these mexicans and then tells them to fuck off. the first time he speaks any spanish is to say “no se” (spelling?) which i felt was ironic. in a good way.

in conclusion, this movie is a piece of mexican propaganda (the three mariachis save the day under the auspices of being “sons of mexico” and the fading images at movie’s end are of banderas kissing a sash of the flag.) canned politics was an interesting direction to take an action sequel. but apparently robert rodriguez (the man behind the spy kids franchise [1, 2, and 3]) had something to say and he was going to cram it in come hell or high water.

the rock, seann william scott, and christopher walken. which of these does not belong? sadly in the rundown all of the above applied. even though i hate walken because he scares me i have to admit he is in a whole other league in terms of cinematic appeal than a wrestler and the walking shit eater grin. crap i am all talk. i totally find the rock appealing. it’s the way he kicks ass. and sws besides being mentally retarded (that actually casts an aspersion on retarded people which is totally unfair) somehow scrapes under my irritation radar and makes a comfy home in my heart. damn him. i am weak.

this movie is not so bad. it’s not so good either though. the rock is a “retrieval specialist”, or bounty hunter, who is sent to get SWS from the brazillian forest. he is sent by sws’s father who is mob-like and mad at him. the rock is confronted with the despotic ruler of some corner of the forest in the person of walken who doesn’t want to let SWS go before he finds this fun ancient artifact crafted entirely out of gold. goooollllllddd. there’s then a romp thru the jungle with meetings of monkeys and small rebel armies. since this is brazil, they have the nation’s dance fighting craze utilized to brilliant effect. they’re like spinny devils of pain! i wish i could do that.

fave line (delivered by the rock): are you threatening me with pee?

pee is a wonderful thing to make light of in my book.

walken also does this humorous turn where he tries to explain the tooth fairy to some non-english speakers/silly american tradition cultural wastelands.

note: this is the terrible movie i went to see for post-rejection release. i don’t know what i was thinking. luckily i then snuck in to see once upon a time in mexico for a johnny depp fix.

well…..nicolas cage first off. the man played a character with many irritating psychotic tics, the thing is that he did it with style. yes, style. he kind of makes you like him. mostly just because of the human interest with his daughter (played by allison lohman–so adorable) who is clearly happy to be around him. sam rockwell, on the other hand, is a god. the man has to do nothing but stand there with that smirk on his face and a hat pulled down over his eyes and i melt. completely melt. add to that the fact that at one point he wore a cowboy hat and claimed that all the ladies love it. and we did. we did love it. swoon.

for those of you unclear on the concept i’m saying that i love sam rockwell.

at the beginning of that previous sentence i was trying to write that i would give a synopsis of the film for those who hadn’t heard of it. but i got sidetracked. i apologize. roy (cage) and frank (rockwell mmm) play partner con-artists. and roy is a little mentally disturbed with agoraphobia and issues with dirt. it comes out that roy has a daughter (lohman) and getting to know her makes roy a little more laid-back. frank and roy then go after this big mark and that is the second, tumultuous half of the film of which i want to give nothing away.

i thought the film was going to be a lot more high-paced with action, but it turned out to be more of a human behavior piece on father/daughter relations. which was nice and they did a splendid job, but still.

lohman was great. rockwell was a little too glib, as if sometimes he wasn’t even trying. cage was good, but then sometimes he would completely lose his tics. at which point i ceased to believe he was playing a character and was just hanging around being chummy.

the plot twists were good and the end of the movie irritated me as i felt it was vaguely unnecessary how they decided to tack on the final shots.

on the whole it was good, but due to the lack of anything big happening the theatre is not required for viewing this movie. therefore i would recommend waiting for video.

i just went and saw underworld, and damn but that movie is sick. it has everything a girl could want. vampires, lycanthropes, guns, semi-impressive new technology for fighting the above species, love. AND an exciting and unexpected ending! well, not the whole ending. but the little twist at the end. that was good.

so this movie is about selene (played by kate beckinsale, who has come a long way from her days playing hero in much ado about nothing, you’ve got to admit), and selene is a vampire whose family was killed by lycanthropes and she was rescued by this old pure-born vampire named viktor who took her in. and she stumbles upon this lycanthrope plot to make a special new weapon out of scott speedman (from felicity. ha ha. but no, seriously, he’s not bad in this) playing michael corvin. so the movie follows this war which has been waging between vampires and lycans for 1000 years and thru exciting flashbacks and carefully revealed info we learn the cause of the war, the truth about selene and michael’s respective pasts, and the future of the vampire/lycan conflict.

in between the whole movie is this dark imbued cinematography. i don’t think they once filmed during the day, they all wear dark colors, so generally the only light things were the moon and the vampire’s glowing blue eyeballs when they change.

the fight scenes are not really rave worthy, but they’re not bad. since it’s almost all done with guns, it’s fairly typical choreographing with the added benefit of a few jumps from very high up, and half the opposing forces turning into big ugly werewolves sometimes. but kate beckinsale wanders around encased in tight black leather all the time, and there’s nothing wrong with that.

so, if you’re a fan of the laurell k hamilton books or buffy, i strongly recommend this movie. it’s fucking sweet. if you’re against supernatural/occult films then you can go see the fighting temptations.